ArticleTranslational cancer research2026
Expression profiling, molecular subtyping and prognostic signature construction of chemokines and chemokine receptors in gastric cancer.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is a highly heterogeneous malignancy of the digestive tract, with significant variations in treatment response and clinical prognosis depending on its molecular subtypes. Chemokines and chemokine receptors (CCRs) have been implicated in GC initiation and progression, yet the precise mechanisms underlying their role remain poorly defined. This study mainly focused on a systematic investigation of CCRs in GC is of critical clinical and scientific importance. Methods: We comprehensively analyzed the transcriptional profiles and mutational landscape of CCRs in GC and constructed a CCR-related prognostic signature. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort (371 GC samples) served as the training set, and the GSE84437 dataset was used as the validation cohort. Consensus clustering based on CCR gene expression was performed for patient stratification. A prognostic risk model was developed using a stepwise approach combining univariate Cox regression, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Correlations between the risk score, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and immunotherapy response were also evaluated. Results: We identified 25 significantly upregulated and 12 significantly downregulated CCR genes in GC tissues. Consensus clustering based on CCR expression effectively stratified patients into subgroups with distinct prognoses and tumor microenvironment (TME) characteristics. A 9-gene prognostic signature, including four novel genes ( Conclusions: Our study provides novel insights into the biological roles of CCRs in GC. We propose a CCR-based molecular stratification strategy and a prognostic signature that may serve as a complementary tool for risk assessment in GC patients, pending further prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.