ArticleNoro psikiyatri arsivi2026
Subclinical Trigeminal Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis Detected by Pulp Sensibility Testing.
Article in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Trigeminal involvement in multiple sclerosis (MS) may remain clinically silent despite measurable functional disturbance. Subclinical dysfunction of afferent pathways can precede overt neurological findings. We aimed to investigate whether pulp sensibility testing can detect subclinical trigeminal afferent dysfunction in patients with MS who have no clinical evidence of trigeminal neuropathy. Methods: Thirty-nine patients with MS (19 relapsing-remitting and 20 progressive) and 27 healthy controls were included. Electric pulp testing (EPT) and cold stimulation were applied to the right maxillary central incisor in all participants. For EPT, sensory threshold values were recorded. For the cold test, response latency was measured in seconds. Correlation analyses were performed to assess associations with age and disease duration. Results: Compared with controls, patients with MS demonstrated higher EPT thresholds and prolonged cold response times. Within the MS cohort, both measures were greater in progressive disease. The difference reached statistical significance for cold testing (7.15±3.60 vs 4.89±2.58 s, p=0.038), whereas EPT values showed a similar but non-significant trend (9.80±4.15 vs 7.84±4.59, p=0.084). Age correlated weakly with cold response latency (r Conclusion: Despite the limitations of our study, our results indicate that pulp sensibility testing may provide meaningful information regarding the functional status of trigeminal afferent pathways. The more pronounced alterations observed in the progressive disease subgroup are consistent with cumulative conduction disturbance along the trigeminal system. Further studies directly comparing this approach with trigeminal SEP and high-resolution brainstem MRI are needed to better define its diagnostic value and clinical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.