ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Medical care or clean energy? The impact of medical insurance on rural households' use of clean cooking energy.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Promoting the use of clean cooking energy is crucial for safeguarding the health of rural households. However, despite its role as a health-enhancing good, few studies have examined the relationship between clean energy use and other forms of health investment. While medical insurance improves rural households' access to medical care, its impact on clean cooking energy use remains unclear. Methods: Using micro-level household panel data from 2012 to 2022, this study employs a two-way fixed effects model to examine the impact of medical insurance on rural households' use of clean cooking energy. In addition, we conduct a series of robustness checks to verify the reliability of the main findings. We further perform heterogeneity analyses to examine whether the effect of medical insurance on clean cooking energy use differs by household age structure, household assets, and medical access barrier. Results: The results show that: (1) medical insurance participation significantly reduces the probability that rural households use clean cooking energy; (2) medical insurance increases the probability of hospitalization, out-of-pocket medical expenditures, inpatient expenditures, total household medical expenditures, and the share of medical spending in the household budget; and (3) the negative effect is more pronounced among households with higher old-age dependency ratios, lower asset holdings, and greater barriers to medical access. Conclusion: This study reveals an unintended consequence of medical insurance and provides important insights for governments seeking to promote both insurance coverage and clean cooking energy use. This issue is particularly relevant for many developing countries, where health protection and clean energy promotion are often pursued simultaneously under tight household budget constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.