ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026
A Dialogic Participatory Model Between Professionals and Patients for the Co-Creation of Transitioning Care Management Programmes in Rare Bone Diseases.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Dialogic Participatory Model Between Professionals and Patients for the Co-Creation of Transitioning Care Management Programmes in Rare Bone Diseases.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionRare diseases are a group of heterogeneous conditions affecting fewer than 5 per 10,000 individuals in Europe, with rare bone diseases representing a clinically significant subgroup. Multiple osteochondromas, Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome are multifocal benign rare disorders, characterised by bone deformities, functional limitations, with symptoms arising early in life and chronically progressing. Proper transition planned programmes to accompany patients moving from childhood to adulthood are limited. This study aims to describe the steps taken to establish a shared consensus on recommended actions for transitioning, by implementing a co-creative approach that involves healthcare professionals, a patient organisation (ACAR Aps), patients and families.
methodsThe first step was the definition and development of a dialogic participatory model (DPM) performed by ACAR Aps with the guidance of an expert in healthcare management, which supported the definition of a guiding question. The second step was composed of a set of multidisciplinary brainstorming sessions aiming at answering the guiding question. The ACAR Aps were responsible for the third step, which consisted of the organisation and summary of the brainstorming sessions, leading to preliminary operational solutions. The final step comprised the collective validation during the patient organisation meeting. This discussion involved experts and members of the ACAR Aps community, providing an open forum to share, discuss and refine the preliminary recommendations.
resultsThe DPM resulted in the definition of 11 operational solutions to improve transitional care for patients with MO, OD and MS organised according to the entity primarily responsible for their implementation. These solutions constitute measures to address patients' priorities in the short- and medium-term.
conclusionThe entire process represents a structured yet flexible environment for collaborative consensus-building and for the establishment of actionable, achievable and community-endorsed solutions. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study was conceived, designed and conducted by the ACAR Aps patient organisation. Patients and caregivers played a pivotal role in the research process, actively participating in roundtable discussions during the association's national convention. Their insights and lived experiences were instrumental in reviewing and refining the study's contents, ensuring that the findings accurately reflect the priorities and perspectives of the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.