ArticleAnatomical sciences education2026
Histories in bone: Navigating the ethical landscape of human skeletal collections in South Africa.
Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Provenance is at the center of addressing the complicated ethical stewardship of legacy human skeletal collections. Many South African (SA) health science institutions have skeletal collections. While the history of the collections and the demographics of the skeletons have been reported, the provenance of the individuals within the collections, a key factor in ethical practice, has yet to be fully explored. The aim of this study was to investigate the provenance and demographics of the individuals housed in the modern human skeletal collections of South African anatomy departments to ensure their ethical stewardship. The provenance and demographic data (sex, age at death, year of death, and population affinity) of individuals housed in five modern human skeletal collections in SA health sciences institutions were collected. Descriptive statistics were applied to the data to derive frequencies, percentages, and means (SD). The majority of skeletons (83%; n = 3734) in the collections surveyed have been sourced from unclaimed individuals. For those institutions where population affinity was provided, SA Black individuals comprised 71% (n = 2586) of the unclaimed group. Skeletons from bequests were low (15%; n = 683), of which 99% (n = 452) were SA White, older individuals. Male individuals comprised 71% (n = 3196) of the collections. The high number of skeletons from unclaimed bodies in these collections highlights the challenge of ethical stewardship facing curators and institutions housing these collections. The continued use of these collections requires sustained discourse, policy development, and legislative oversight to facilitate the ethical treatment of the individuals within the collections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.