ReviewChembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology2026
Strategies for the Selection and Application of Biological Scaffolds in Organ-on-a-Chip Systems.
Review in Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Strategies for the Selection and Application of Biological Scaffolds in Organ-on-a-Chip Systems.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As an emerging microphysiological system, organ-on-a-chip (OoC) replicates human organ structures and functions through microfabrication, holding promise as novel platforms for drug screening, disease modeling, and toxicity testing, although their broad application still faces significant validation challenges. This review systematically examines biomimetic scaffold selection strategies in OoC systems, with a focus on hydrogels, hydrogel microspheres, and other scaffold types. It details chip fabrication processes, including design concepts, material selection, microfabrication technology, and cell sources. By comparing physicochemical properties, biocompatibility, and functional characteristics of different materials, this paper explores optimal scaffold strategies for specific organ simulations. Based on comprehensive analysis, hydrogel scaffolds have become widely adopted for OoC construction due to their excellent biocompatibility and extracellular matrix-like properties. Synthetic polymers and bioceramic scaffolds demonstrate significant value in meeting specific mechanical requirements and constructing complex microstructures. As a novel hydrogel form, hydrogel microspheres exhibit considerable potential in dynamic culture simulation and drug delivery owing to their high specific surface area and controllable release capabilities. This paper also discusses future directions, including personalized scaffold design, intelligent responsive materials, and multiorgan coupling systems, providing theoretical guidance for advancing OoC technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.