ArticleNoise & health
Effect of Noise-Reduction Management Combined with Extended Postoperative Care on Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Noise & health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to analyse the effectiveness of implementing noise reduction management combined with an extended postoperative care model in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using data from 78 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Based on the nursing care protocol, patients were divided into a control group ( n = 39) and a study group ( n = 39). The control group received routine care, whereas the study group received noise reduction management combined with extended postoperative care. The two groups were compared in terms of pain levels, sleep quality, gastrointestinal discomfort symptoms, quality of life and nursing satisfaction.
resultsNo significant differences were observed between the two groups in baseline data (all P- values >0.05). Compared with the control group, the study group showed significantly lower postoperative pain scores at 2 weeks (Numerical Rating Scale score: 1.53 ± 0.84 vs. 2.05 ± 1.33, t = 1.998, P = 0.049), as well as significantly improved gastrointestinal symptoms (total Gastrointestinal Symptom score: F = 22.43, P < 0.001), enhanced quality of life (Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index at 8 weeks: 124.2 ± 5.38 vs. 115.4 ± 4.69, t = 2.66, P = 0.009), better sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index daytime dysfunction at 2 weeks: 4.37 ± 1.35 vs. 5.89 ± 1.56, t = 2.15, P = 0.035) and increased nursing satisfaction (Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scale score: 86.69 ± 7.31 vs. 78.34 ± 5.93, t = 5.54, P < 0.001).
conclusionThis retrospective study suggests that integrating noise reduction management with extended postoperative care may be associated with favourable outcomes in LC patients, including reduced postoperative pain, fewer gastrointestinal symptoms, improved sleep quality and enhanced quality of life and nursing satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.