Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42446477›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026

Validation of a New Handheld Automated Fixed-Force Applanation Tonometer.

Fiona S McDonnell, Erin Simons, Michael Zhu, W Daniel Stamer, Joanne C Wen

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fiona S McDonnellDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Erin SimonsBlur Product Development, Cary, NC, USA.
Michael ZhuDuke Eye Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
W Daniel StamerDuke Eye Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Joanne C WenDuke Eye Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To validate a novel tonometer on ex vivo human eyes. Methods: A device was constructed to apply a known and constant force using a custom tonometer tip, and the resulting applanation image is recorded with a camera. Software automatically measures the applanation area and converts to an intraocular pressure (IOP). Ex vivo human eyes were cannulated, and the IOP manometrically was set to 5 to 45 mm Hg in 5-mm Hg increments. At each IOP, a 5- to 10-second recording was obtained with the device and converted to an IOP. Measured IOPs were compared to the set IOP value. Results: Eight ex vivo human eyes were included in this study. The mean difference (± SD) and mean absolute difference (± SD) between the stable gravity-induced manometric IOP and the measured IOP were -1.2 ± 4.5 mm Hg and 3.1 ± 3.5 mm Hg, respectively. Within the 10- to 30-mm Hg range, the mean difference and absolute difference were 0.7 ± 1.7 mm Hg and 1.4 ± 1.1 mm Hg, respectively. The prototype IOP and the set IOP showed a significant linear correlation across the full range of set IOPs (R2 = 0.90, P < 0.0001), which improved further for the more clinically relevant range of 10- to 30-mm Hg set IOPs (R2 = 0.95, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Compared to clamped IOP, measurements using a novel handheld automated fixed-force applanation tonometer demonstrated high accuracy, especially within the 10- to 30-mm Hg range. Translational Relevance: We present a novel tonometer validated on ex vivo human eyes, which demonstrates high accuracy and may have applicability to patient care.

Indexed as

Intraocular PressureTonometry, OcularEquipment DesignHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID42446477
PMCPMC13387270

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.