ReviewCancer metastasis reviews2026
Rewiring cancer cell fate toward vasculogenic mimicry: from classical to unconventional processes.
Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pathological vasculogenic mimicry (VM) is the process by which aggressive tumor stem cells form perfusable, matrix-rich, vessel-like networks, facilitating tumor perfusion and metastasis. Several well-characterized VM drivers include hypoxia, acidity, growth factors, and inflammatory molecules. Likewise, canonical and non-canonical transitions, such as epithelial-to-mesenchymal, epithelial-to-endothelial, endothelial-to-mesenchymal, and epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity contribute to VM formation. In addition, atypical mechanisms such as cell-cell fusion, polyploidization, gene silencing, and processes associated with viral infections have also been linked to VM induction. Clinically, VM has been associated with poor prognosis, metastasis, and resistance to antiangiogenic, chemo- and radiotherapeutic compounds, which may independently trigger or exacerbate VM. Therapeutic strategies to fight this highly adaptive process include combination regimens that simultaneously inhibit angiogenesis and VM, thereby preventing the emergence of alternative survival mechanisms. Likewise, key nodes and signaling pathways involved in VM, such as Notch, Wnt, and PI3K/AKT, are under active preclinical evaluation, together with pro-differentiating factors that attenuate stem-associated traits. However, despite its therapeutic relevance, the mechanistic basis of VM remains insufficiently integrated, leaving a gap in biomedical literature. To address this, the aim of this review was to provide comprehensive coverage of current evidence encompassing both well-established processes associated with VM and those not yet fully characterized. Our work integrates the analysis of signaling pathways, key molecular players, lineage plasticity, and microenvironmental factors that orchestrate VM. In addition, therapeutic challenges and opportunities are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42446762What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.