Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42446783›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2026

Enhancing Disease Surveillance and Pharmacovigilance Practices for RTS,S/AS01

Valérie Haine, Tene-Alima Essoh, Caroline Perrin Franck, Miloje Savic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Valérie HaineGSK, Wavre, Belgium.
Tene-Alima EssohAgence de Médecine Préventive Afrique (AMP Afrique), Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Caroline Perrin FranckDepartment of Radiology and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Miloje SavicGSK, Wavre, Belgium. miloje.x.savic@gsk.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rollout of new vaccines in low- and middle-income countries often faces significant challenges due to underdeveloped disease surveillance and pharmacovigilance practices for monitoring vaccine safety and effectiveness. In 2019, RTS,S/AS01

objectiveHere, we describe the capacity-building experience, including targeted training strategies and accompanying paper-based and digital tools developed to improve detection, diagnosis, and reporting of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) and adverse events following immunization (AEFIs). We summarize the impact of the initiative, challenges, and actions taken, and share lessons learned to guide future capacity-building initiatives in low- and middle-income countries.

methodsThe initiative included tailored, frequent, 2-day in-person training sessions for both medical and non-medical professionals in hospital and community settings, complemented by online courses, practical job aids, a tele-expertise platform, and a mobile alert system to improve adverse event reporting.

resultsThe initiative reached approximately 5000 community healthcare professionals and 1000 study staff. Knowledge assessments after the trainings indicated marked improvements, with scores increasing from 41% to 72% among medical professionals and from 38% to 68% among non-medical professionals after initial training; similar gains were observed after refresher training (45% to 74% and 45% to 72%, respectively). Across the three countries involved in the pilot implementation, 90% of reported AESIs and AEFIs were documented through the phase IV studies. Trainings were generally well received; however, digital tools were underutilized due to the perceived operational burden and user preferences. The repeated use of similar training materials across sessions required the introduction of new clinical cases and knowledge quizzes to maintain participant engagement. In addition, resource limitations, including intermittent connectivity and logistical constraints, posed practical challenges.

conclusionsThis experience highlights the importance of tailored training, flexibility, collaboration, and prior alignment on integrating new tools into existing procedures. Overall, our approach may offer valuable insights for future pharmacovigilance capacity-building efforts in low- and middle-income countries to support safer vaccine rollout. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY:

Indexed as

MalariaMalaria VaccinesPharmacovigilanceAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsCapacity BuildingGhanaHealth PersonnelHumansKenyaMalawiVaccines, SyntheticMalaria VaccinesRTS,S-AS01 vaccineVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID42446783
PMCPMC13558353

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.