ReviewPharmacoEconomics2026
Economic Evaluation of Interventions for Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Practical Guidance.
Review in PharmacoEconomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurodevelopmental disorders are lifelong conditions with onset in early childhood that impair cognitive, social, behavioural and physical functioning. Their consequences extend beyond healthcare, shaping education, social and community services, and family life. Economic evaluations can guide payers by quantifying the value for money of interventions, but standard methods require adaptation for this context. This paper offers practical guidance for pharmacoeconomic evaluations of interventions for children with neurodevelopmental disorders, synthesising methodological literature and applied experience to articulate core challenges, recommend solutions and highlight emerging opportunities. Evaluations must address five inter-related issues: defining and justifying an analytic perspective that captures multi-sectoral costs and benefits; identifying and valuing direct, indirect and intangible costs across health, education and social domains; selecting outcomes sensitive to changes in child functioning and health-related quality of life that can be economically valued; incorporating spillover effects for caregivers and families; and modelling long-term developmental trajectories amid data scarcity and uncertainty. We recommend adopting a societal perspective; applying comprehensive context-appropriate costing; combining generic and condition-specific outcome measures; explicitly including caregiver and family impacts; integrating equity analyses; and using long time horizons supported by robust modelling such as microsimulation or agent-based approaches. Promising directions include capability-based frameworks and digital biomarkers to enable real-world measurement of function and quality of life. Tailored pharmacoeconomic methods are essential for credible policy-relevant evaluations of neurodevelopmental disorder interventions. Transparent reporting and alignment with international standards will improve comparability, support uptake by decision makers, and promote equitable resource allocation for children and families affected by neurodevelopmental disorders.
Identifiers
42446849What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.