Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42447100›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2026

Bone physiological adaptations to whole-body vibration in mouse models: A Systematic Review.

Roberto Bonanni, Ida Cariati, Lucio Caprioli, Cristian Romagnoli, Angela Falvino, Saeid Edriss, Pierangelo Cifelli, Giovanna D'Arcangelo, Elvira Padua, Virginia Tancredi and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Roberto BonanniDepartment of Human Science and Promotion of Quality of Life, San Raffaele Open University, Rome, Italy.
Ida CariatiDepartment of Systems Medicine, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2102-5034
Lucio CaprioliSports Engineering Laboratory, Department of Industrial Engineering, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4049-5225
Cristian RomagnoliDepartment of Human Science and Promotion of Quality of Life, San Raffaele Open University, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0904-634X
Angela FalvinoDepartment of Systems Medicine, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Saeid EdrissSports Engineering Laboratory, Department of Industrial Engineering, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Pierangelo CifelliDepartment of Human Science and Promotion of Quality of Life, San Raffaele Open University, Rome, Italy.
Giovanna D'ArcangeloDepartment of Systems Medicine, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Elvira PaduaDepartment of Human Science and Promotion of Quality of Life, San Raffaele Open University, Rome, Italy.
Virginia TancrediDepartment of Systems Medicine, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe AnninoDepartment of Systems Medicine, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-body vibration (WBV) is known to mechanically stimulate bone tissue, modulating its turnover and microarchitecture. Our systematic review aimed to collect the available evidence on the effects of WBV in mouse models, comparing the different experimental protocols and results obtained. A systematic literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Experimental studies investigating the effects of WBV on healthy mice of different age groups, models of osteoporosis or fracture healing, and other models of bone loss were included. Methodological quality was assessed using SYRCLE's RoB tool to analyze the reliability of the results and the risk of bias and the adapted GRADE approach to determine the overall level of certainty of the evidence. Twenty-nine studies were included, of which 10 were on healthy mice, 9 on osteoporotic or fracture healing models, and 10 on other models of bone loss. Overall, WBV improved bone formation, mineral density, and trabecular and cortical microarchitecture, although the results were heterogeneous and dependent on frequency, acceleration, duration, and recovery times. In some models, WBV combined with parathyroid hormone (PTH) or oestrogen showed synergistic effects, while in disuse and metabolic models, mechanical vibrations preserved bone mass and reduced osteoclastic activity. WBV represents a potentially useful strategy for modulating bone turnover and improving density and microarchitecture, with effects strongly influenced by protocol parameters and pathophysiological status. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms, optimize protocols, and evaluate the clinical impact in different study populations.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBone and BonesVibrationAnimalsBone DensityDisease Models, AnimalFracture HealingMiceOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID42447100
PMCPMC13367732

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.