ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2026
[Early detection of Insuline Resistence in Pregnant Women].
Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gestational diabetes due to insulin resistance (IR) is a priority health problem for the WHO given its consequences for both mother and fetus. Objective: To determine the suitability of HOMA-IR for early detection of insulin resistance in the first trimester of pregnancy. Materials and methods: A quantitative, comparative, and correlational study was conducted in 30 pregnant women, selected by convenience sampling. IR was determined in the first trimester using the HOMA-IR test with cut-off points based on pre-pregnancy Body Mass Index (BMI) in the first trimester and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in the second trimester. Analysis was performed using SPSS with the following statistical methods: Shapiro-Wilk normality test; Pearson's and Spearman's r correlation coefficients; Levene's test for independent samples; Student's t-test; and Mann-Whitney U test; as well as risk analysis with respect to BMI. Results: The average age was 27 years. No relationship was found between HOMA-IR and sociodemographic variables or pre-pregnancy BMI. During the first trimester, HOMA-IR detected IR in 56.6% of pregnant women; while in the second trimester, the OGTT detected IR in 66.3% of pregnant women. A moderate relationship was found between HOMA-IR and OGTT values at one and two hours, but not in the fasting state. The difference in mean HOMA-IR values between the groups with and without IR persisted in the OGTT tests performed in the fasting, one-hour, and two-hour states. Pre-pregnancy BMI indicating overweight and obesity did not represent a significant risk. Conclusions: The HOMA-IR study proved useful for the early detection of IR, which can be used to guide lifestyle modifications in women with risk factors. Further scientific evidence is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.