Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42447244›Full record

Trial reportThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2026

Psychosocial outcomes following dual-task high-velocity exercise training in older adults: a secondary analysis of an 18-month cluster randomized controlled trial.

Jamie L Tait, Rachel L Duckham, Timo Rantalainen, Catherine M Milte, Luana C Main, Caryl A Nowson, Kerrie M Sanders, Dennis R Taaffe, Keith D Hill, Gavin Abbott and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jamie L TaitInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Rachel L DuckhamAustralian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS), Department of Medicine-Western Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Timo RantalainenFinnish Institute of High Performance Sport KIHU, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6977-4782
Catherine M MilteInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0035-6405
Luana C MainInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Caryl A NowsonInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Kerrie M SandersDepartment of Medicine, Western Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Dennis R TaaffeExercise Medicine Research Institute and School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6381-1597
Keith D HillRehabilitation Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2191-0308
Gavin AbbottInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4014-0705
Robin M DalyInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP1046267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPower and resistance training can improve older adults' perceived health, and while cognitive training has mixed benefits, combined effects remain uncertain. This secondary analysis of an 18-month cluster randomized controlled trial investigated whether dual-task functional power training (DT-FPT) improves psychosocial outcomes in older adults at risk for falls.

methodsTwenty-two independent-living retirement communities (300 residents, ≥65 years) were randomized to 12 months of group-based DT-FPT (6 months supervised + 6 months maintenance; 2/week, 45-60 min) performed with cognitive and/or motor tasks or control (CON), followed by a 6-month follow-up. Health-related quality of life (HR-QoL; SF-36v2), life satisfaction (Personal Wellbeing Index), and psychological distress (Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale [DASS-21]) were assessed at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months, generating subscale, summary, and composite scores.

resultsOverall, 227 (76%) participants provided data at the 18-month follow-up; mean exercise adherence was 50% at 6 months and 40% at 12 months. At 6 months, DT-FPT showed net benefits compared to CON for physical functioning (1.77 points [95% CI: 0.03, 3.51]; p = .047), role-physical (2.71 [0.35, 5.08]; p = .025), and role-emotional (2.25 [0.09, 4.40]; p = .041) HR-QoL domains. No changes were observed in life satisfaction or psychological distress, but CON showed lower Anxiety DASS-21 subscale scores than DT-FPT at 12 months (-2.0 [-3.22, -0.76]; p = .001) and 18 months (-0.93 [-1.84, -0.02]; p = .045). DISCUSSION: DT-FPT delivered to older, retirement-living adults at risk of falls may improve select HR-QoL domains, potentially reducing perceived physical limitations in daily activities, but shows no sustained effects or impact on life satisfaction.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsQuality of LifeResistance TrainingAgedAged, 80 and overDual-Task TestsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePersonal SatisfactionDual-task trainingHealth-related quality of lifeLife satisfactionPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID42447244
PMCPMC13537523

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.