ReviewAgeing research reviews2026
A compendium of circulating biomarkers of senescence in humans: Insights on mechanistic impact across health domains and modulation by therapeutic interventions.
Review in Ageing research reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cellular senescence is a hallmark of aging and a contributing factor to many age-related morbidity and decline. A key characteristic of senescent cells is a pro-inflammatory secretome known as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). When tracked in circulation, SASP factors associate with age-related clinical traits and diseases, raising the captivating possibility that the senescence burden, and concomitant susceptibility to age-related morbidity, can be noninvasively assessed in clinical settings. This review consolidates human-focused evidence identifying these biomarkers of senescence in circulation, and emerging drug and lifestyle-based senotherapeutic interventions that modulate senescence burden and associated clinical parameters. Clinical parameters associated with the circulating senescence burden generally fall into four interrelated health domains: neurodegeneration, pulmonary disease, cardiometabolic disease, and musculoskeletal disorders. For each domain, the biological basis for the negative impact of senescence is explored in clinical and preclinical models, revealing that the accumulation of senescence often suppresses stemness throughout the body, suggesting that senescence plays a causal role in age-related decline and highlighting potential novel therapeutic avenues. Importantly, some circulating biomarkers of senescence, such as GDF15 and Activin A, demonstrate cross-study clinical relevance and are implicated in morbidities across multiple health domains. Collectively, these insights provide a framework for understanding the role that senescence plays in aging and the development of diagnostic biomarker panels that could better inform future clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.