SynthesisBMJ open respiratory research2026
Biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Synthesis in BMJ open respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease, and a subset of patients exhibits type 2 (T2) inflammation. Biologic therapies targeting T2 inflammatory pathways have been evaluated in COPD, but their clinical efficacy remains variable. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of biologic therapies targeting T2 inflammation in COPD.
methodsRandomised controlled trials evaluating biologic therapies targeting interleukin (IL)-5, IL-5 receptor α, IL-4/IL-13 or thymic stromal lymphopoietin in patients with COPD and biomarker-defined T2 inflammation were systematically identified. Outcomes included moderate or severe COPD exacerbations, lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁)), health-related quality of life assessed by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and serious adverse events. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted when at least two comparable studies were available. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool.
resultsSeven randomised controlled trials were included in the quantitative synthesis. Biologic therapies targeting T2 inflammation significantly reduced the rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations compared with placebo (rate ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.83; p<0.001; I²=0%). Lung function improved modestly with a pooled increase in FEV₁ of 43 mL (95% CI 12.5 to 73.6; p=0.006; I²=55.3%). SGRQ total scores improved by -2.46 units (95% CI -3.43 to -1.49; p<0.001; I²=0%). Subgroup analyses showed the greatest reduction in exacerbations with IL-4/IL-13-targeting therapy in patients with blood eosinophil counts ≥300 cells/µL. No significant increase in serious adverse events was observed.
conclusionsBiologic therapies targeting T2 inflammation improve clinical outcomes in certain patients with COPD. The most consistent improvements were observed in studies that focused on inhibiting the IL-4/IL-13 pathway. However, variations in patient selection and in T2 enrichment strategies across trials make direct comparisons challenging. These results favour a biomarker-based, personalised approach over the routine use of biologics in unselected populations with COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.