SynthesisBlood cancer journal2026
Subsequent CAR-T and engineered antibody for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma following BCMA-targeted treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Blood cancer journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Relapse following B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed therapies represents a critical challenge in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 studies (n = 1280) published between 2020 and 2025 to evaluate salvage CAR-T versus engineered antibody therapies post-BCMA exposure. The pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 60%. CAR-T therapy achieved significantly superior ORR compared to antibody-based approaches (77% vs 52%; p < 0.0001), with comparable complete response rates. While incidences of cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome were similar, grade ≥3 cytopenias were more frequent with CAR-T. Notably, GPRC5D-targeted CAR-T yielded higher ORRs than BCMA-targeted constructs (86% vs 66%; p = 0.0006). Furthermore, patients with prior exposure to BCMA bispecific antibodies exhibited lower response rates compared to those with prior CAR-T exposure (71% vs 86%; p = 0.0404). In addition, studies with a median interval of ≥10 months demonstrated significantly higher ORRs than those with <10 months (70% vs 50%; p = 0.0146). In conclusion, GPRC5D CAR-T demonstrates superior efficacy to engineered antibodies in the post-BCMA setting. These findings support prioritising earlier CAR-T use and underscore the importance of antigen selection in optimising treatment sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.