ArticleScientific reports2026
Insight into cytotoxic and molecular mechanisms of bee venom and its nanoemulsion against West Nile virus in vitro.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
West Nile virus (WNV) causes West Nile fever and is primarily transmitted by Culex spp. mosquitoes. The primary hosts of WNV are birds, while humans and horses can also develop illness following infection. Currently, no specific antiviral therapy exists for WNV, and vaccination remains the only effective preventive measure. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of the crude bee venom (BV) and its nanoemulsion (NE) on WNV by determining in vitro Vero cells cytotoxicity and viral titer by RT-qPCR. We also conducted BV peptides-envelope glycoprotein of WNV interactions by molecular docking analysis. The NE of BV was characterized by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and zeta potential analyses. The DLS revealed that the size of NE was greater than that of BV. Also, the DLS showed that the polydispersity index of NE was less than that of BV (0.349 and 0.557, respectively). Zeta potential analysis of NE was slightly less than that of BV (23.0 and 23.7 mV, respectively). Both treatments showed low cytopathic effects on Vero cells compared to positive control infected with WNV. RT-qPCR revealed that the titer of WNV was lower in cells treated with BV and its NE than in controls. Molecular docking revealed BV peptides-envelope glycoprotein of WNV interactions, with binding energy of - 5.2, - 4.5, - 13.0, - 10.8, and - 5.1 kcal/mol for the peptides apamin, tertiapin, melittin, mast cell degranulating peptide, and secapin-2 peptide, respectively. BV-NE demonstrated preliminary in vitro anti-WNV activity requiring mechanistic, toxicological, and in vivo validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.