ReviewInternational ophthalmology2026
Global research trends in central retinal artery occlusion: a bibliometric analysis (1980-2025).
Review in International ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyse the evolution, intellectual structure, and thematic trends of the central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) literature using bibliometric methods.
methodsA topic-based search of the Web of Science Core Collection retrieved all CRAO-related articles and reviews indexed from 1980, the year of the earliest eligible record, through 2025. Publication output, countries, institutions, authors, journals, citations, and keywords were analysed using the Bibliometrix R package. Collaboration networks and thematic mapping were visualised with VOSviewer. Reference-level citation burst analysis was performed in CiteSpace using the Kleinberg algorithm.
resultsA total of 1,952 publications were included. Scientific output increased substantially, particularly during the last decade (average annual growth rate 7.43%). Research productivity and citation impact were concentrated in a limited number of countries and institutions, led by the United States. Co-citation and journal analyses identified a core group of influential authors and ophthalmology journals shaping the field. Keyword analyses demonstrated a shift from descriptive and etiological studies toward advanced imaging techniques, acute treatment strategies, and increasing integration with neurovascular concepts, including stroke and thrombolysis. Citation bursts were generally short-lived, indicating gradual and fragmented knowledge development.
conclusionThe CRAO literature has evolved from a predominantly descriptive ophthalmic field into a multidisciplinary domain increasingly aligned with acute neurovascular medicine. Despite increasing research activity, further high-quality collaborative efforts and more standardized research approaches are needed to strengthen future developments in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42448896What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.