Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42449411›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive care2026

Previous-day physical restraint duration as a bedside signal for following-day delirium: a retrospective patient-day analysis in a mixed ICU.

Aki Sasaki, Tomoki Kuribara, Takeshi Unoki, Junpei Haruna, Hiroomi Tatsumi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aki Sasaki *Intensive Care Unit, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, South-1, West-16, Chuo-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8543, Japan.
Tomoki Kuribara *Department of Acute and Critical Care Nursing, School of Nursing, Sapporo City University, 13-1 Kita-11, Nishi-13, Chuo-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0011, Japan.
Takeshi UnokiDepartment of Acute and Critical Care Nursing, School of Nursing, Sapporo City University, 13-1 Kita-11, Nishi-13, Chuo-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0011, Japan. iwhyh1029@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7778-4355
Junpei HarunaIntensive Care Unit, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, South-1, West-16, Chuo-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8543, Japan.
Hiroomi TatsumiIntensive Care Unit, Hakodate Municipal Hospital, 1-10-1 Minatomachi, Hakodate, Hokkaido, 041-8680, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25K13839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelirium is common in the intensive care unit and associated with adverse outcomes. However, bedside indicators that flag patients at high risk for delirium the following day are lacking. Although physical restraint has been linked to delirium, many prior studies relied on cross-sectional, same-day assessments that cannot exclude reverse causation. This study aimed to evaluate whether cumulative previous-day physical restraint duration was a bedside signal for following-day delirium.

methodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective observational cohort study using patient-days (00:00-24:00 h) as the unit of analysis, with the exposure and covariates derived from more granular, time-stamped nursing records aggregated into calendar-day units. The exposure was cumulative physical restraint duration on the previous day, reported per 8-h increase. The outcome was incident delirium on the following day, defined as an Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) score ≥ 4. The primary analysis was restricted to patient-days without previous-day delirium (ICDSC 0-3). We fitted a generalized linear mixed model with a random intercept for each patient. The restraint duration was modeled using a natural cubic spline (degrees of freedom = 3).

resultsOf 1,482 patient-days from 281 patients, 263 patient-days were excluded due to coma. The primary analysis included 729 patient-days from 247 patients without previous-day delirium (115 incident delirium events, 15.8%). The association between restraint duration and following-day incident delirium was non-linear (likelihood ratio test, P < 0.001). Using no restraint as the reference, the odds ratios were 2.43 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64-3.61) at 8 h, 5.16 (95% CI 3.39-7.85) at 16 h, and 10.01 (95% CI 6.31-15.88) at 24 h. Sensitivity analyses using complete-case analysis, last observation carried forward, best-case/worst-case extreme scenarios, and adjustment for previous-day mental status yielded consistent results.

conclusionsIn this single-center cohort, longer restraint duration on the previous day was associated with a higher risk of incident delirium the following day and may serve as a bedside-observable signal rather than evidence of a causal effect. Residual confounding may remain; prospective observational studies are needed to confirm this signal before its clinical utility is evaluated.

Indexed as

Bedside signalCritical illnessDeliriumICUPhysical restraint

Identifiers

PMID42449411
PMCPMC13520223

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.