ArticleDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2026
Association of Variability of Monthly Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Derived Metrics With Diabetic Kidney Disease in Type 1 Diabetes.
Article in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association of Variability of Monthly Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Derived Metrics With Diabetic Kidney Disease in Type 1 Diabetes.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile HbA1c is the standard for monitoring long-term glycaemic control, it fails to capture glycaemic variability. We investigated the discriminatory capacity of longitudinal continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics and identified CGM metric patterns associated with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using machine learning (ML).
methodsWe analysed cross-sectional data from 282 T1D patients with 1-year consecutive CGM data. DKD was defined by persistent laboratory abnormalities (urine albumin-creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg/g or estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m
resultsThe LightGBM model achieved the highest performance (AUROC = 0.91 [95% CI, 0.88-0.93], F1 score = 0.65). All tree-based ML models outperformed the LR model. SHAP analysis identified the standard deviation (SD) of monthly time in range (TIR) and time in tight range (TITR) as the most influential features. In contrast, the CV of sensor glucose did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.416). Even in the early DKD subgroup, the SD of monthly TIR and TITR remained significantly elevated.
conclusionThe SD of monthly TIR and TITR is strongly associated with DKD in T1D, whereas the CV of sensor glucose is not. ML-based integration of these longitudinal metrics offers improved discrimination of concurrent DKD status beyond conventional glycaemic markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.