Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Leila Sara EppenbergerSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 168751, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9336-8941
Eduard TomaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Radu BucsanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0009-0007-2429-7936
Dan George DeleanuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Alina Popa CherecheanuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Gerhard GarhöferDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Leopold SchmettererSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 168751, Singapore.
Funding
Agency for Science, Technology and Research A20H4b0141Duke-NUS Medical School 05/FY2022/EX/66-A128; 2025/EX/000348/National Health Innovation Centre NHIC-I2D-2402329; NHIC-I2D-2506373National Medical Research Council MOH-001072-06; MOH-001286-00; MOH-001574-02; MOH-001576-00; MOH-001745-00; MOH-002044-00National Research Foundation NRF-CRP24-2020-0001Singapore Eye Research Institute I010/2024 [2082/44/2024]; I011/2025 [R2148/42/202]Singapore Eye Research Institute and Nanyang Technological University SERI-NTU Advanced Ocular Engineering (STANCE) ProgramSingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre AM/AIR017/2024 [SRDUKAMR24A7]; AM/AIR025/2025 [SRDUKAMR25A5]
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.
Conjunctival Vascular Metrics Using Automated Vessel Detection from Slit Lamp Images for Hyperemia Severity Assessment. · full record | Socratic