ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Beyond the Core: The Role of Supplementary Short Tandem Repeats in Forensic Genetics.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional forensic DNA profiling predominantly utilizes established core sets of autosomal short tandem repeats (STRs), such as the FBI's Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) and the European Standard Set (ESS). While these panels are effective for standard forensic casework, they may be inadequate in more demanding scenarios, including severely degraded samples, complex multi-contributor mixtures, and kinship cases with deficiencies, where enhanced discriminatory capability is crucial. Additional non-core STR loci address these challenges while maintaining the non-coding, phenotypically uninformative nature that ensures the legal and ethical acceptability of forensic genetic evidence in court. This review assesses the forensic applications, population genetic parameters, validation requirements, and ethical considerations associated with non-core STR loci. A representative supplementary STR panel is presented as a case study to illustrate both the forensic value and the analytical requirements associated with the implementation of extended non-core STR systems. Challenges in implementation were identified in areas such as nomenclature standardization, backward compatibility with existing national databases, and geographic gaps in population reference data. The review concludes that a hybrid strategy, which retains core capillary electrophoresis (CE)-based profiling for routine casework and employs extended non-core panels for complex cases, represents the most practical path for the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.