ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Extracellular Vesicles, Liposomes, and Hybrid Nanovesicles: Comparative Strategies for Targeted Cancer Therapy.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) and liposomes are nanoscale drug delivery systems extensively investigated in oncology for their ability to improve pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and therapeutic efficacy of anticancer agents. Liposomes are clinically validated synthetic nanocarriers characterized by high versatility, scalable production, and established regulatory approval; however, their performance is limited by tumor heterogeneity, vascular barriers, adverse effects and inefficient intracellular drug release. EVs are naturally derived nanoparticles involved in intercellular communication and exhibit intrinsic biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, and biological targeting potential; yet their translation is constrained by heterogeneity, limited loading capacity, and manufacturing challenges. Different studies indicate complementary advantages between both systems, with EVs favoring biological targeting and immune modulation and liposomes enabling controlled formulation and pharmacokinetic optimization. These features have driven the development of hybrid EV-liposome nanovesicles, which integrate synthetic and biological properties to enhance tumor targeting, therapeutic efficacy, and payload diversity, including drugs, nucleic acids, and gene-editing systems. Despite promising preclinical results, challenges remain in scalability, standardization, and mechanistic understanding of in vivo behaviour. Overall, these hybrid strategies represent a promising platform for next-generation precision nanomedicine in cancer therapy and for advancing clinical translation by addressing key limitations of current delivery systems and improving therapeutic index and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.