ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Nanoengineering Systems for Gene Therapy: Mechanisms, Modalities, and Future Directions.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanotechnology has become an important platform in the fields of gene therapy and genome editing, providing delivery strategies that address persistent therapeutic challenges by improving the precision, efficiency, and safety of genetic modifications. This review highlights the central role of nanomaterials in overcoming persistent barriers to genetic interventions, including inefficient delivery, instability of genetic cargo, and off-target effects. Specifically, we emphasize the combined use of nanomaterials with clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR-associated proteins (CRISPR-Cas) systems, which can improve editing specificity and therapeutic efficacy. Beyond the classical CRISPR/Cas9 platform, this review also discusses next-generation modalities such as base editors, Cas13, prime editing, and the recently described Tandem Interspaced Guide RNA and TIGR-associated protein (TIGR-Tas) system, while considering their therapeutic potential and distinct delivery challenges. By using nanomaterials, the stability and intracellular delivery of genome-editing systems are improved, enabling more effective treatments for genetic disorders and acquired diseases such as cancer and infectious diseases. In addition, nanocarriers provide controlled release, protection from degradation, and better biocompatibility, thereby improving the safety and reliability of gene-editing therapies. Despite these advances, important translational challenges remain, including immunotoxicity, large-scale manufacturing, and regulatory integration. Overall, the continued convergence of nanotechnology and genome engineering may support the development of personalized medicine strategies that adapt genetic engineering tools for patient-specific applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.