ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
A Critical Review of Longitudinal DNA Methylomic Changes Associated with Treatment Response in Major Depressive Disorder.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent psychiatric disorder in which epigenetic mechanisms, particularly DNA methylation (DNAm), may contribute to disease vulnerability and treatment response. Epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) have increasingly investigated longitudinal methylomic changes associated with therapeutic interventions in depression; however, methodological heterogeneity limits comparability across studies. This critical review examined the methodologies and findings of longitudinal EWAS evaluating DNAm changes related to treatment response in MDD and treatment-resistant depression (TRD). A literature search identified seven studies published up to 20 June 2026. Six studies investigated non-pharmacological interventions, including electroconvulsive therapy, trauma-focused psychotherapy, and cognitive interventions, and one study explored pharmacotherapy. Considerable heterogeneity was observed regarding sample size, biospecimen type, methylation platforms, preprocessing pipelines, covariate adjustment, statistical modeling, and longitudinal sampling schedules. Most studies used Illumina EPIC array-based workflows and mixed-model analytical approaches, while one study employed sequencing-based methylation profiling. Overall, treatment-related methylation changes were modest and often limited to specific CpG sites or differentially methylated regions associated with immune, inflammatory, stress-related, and neurobiological pathways. Current evidence supports the feasibility of longitudinal EWAS approaches in depression research but highlights the need for larger cohorts, methodological standardization, and integration with multi-omics and clinical data to improve reproducibility and biomarker discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.