ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Encapsulation Strategies for Natural Bioactives in Clean-Label Meat Preservation: A Review.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Processed Meats as Delivery Systems for Nutraceuticals: Technological Advances, Bioavailability, Health Benefits, and Future Perspectives.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing demand for clean-label meat products has accelerated interest in natural bioactive compounds, including essential oils, plant polyphenols, and bacteriocins, as alternatives to synthetic preservatives. These compounds have the potential to enhance product safety and shelf life while meeting consumer expectations. Many natural bioactives exhibit antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, enabling them to reduce lipid oxidation and inhibit the growth of spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms in meat systems. Despite these benefits, their practical application remains limited by instability, volatility, poor solubility, and undesirable sensory effects. Encapsulation technologies have emerged as effective approaches to overcome these limitations by enhancing stability, controlling release behavior, and improving compatibility with complex meat matrices. This review synthesizes evidence from 154 studies published between 2010 and 2026 on the application of encapsulation technologies, including microencapsulation, nanoemulsions, liposomes, and cyclodextrin-based systems, for natural bioactives in meat systems. Encapsulated bioactive delivery systems are evaluated by integrating spoilage mechanisms, delivery system design, and application strategies. Encapsulation approaches are discussed in terms of structure-function relationships, release behavior, and interactions with meat components. Application strategies, including direct incorporation, edible coatings, and active packaging, are comparatively analyzed based on their functional performance in meat systems. Overall, nanoscale delivery systems are particularly effective in improving the dispersion, stability, and functional performance of hydrophobic bioactives, while controlled-release systems offer prolonged protection but often exhibit reduced predictability when translated from model systems to real meat matrices. Current challenges related to scalability, cost, regulatory constraints, sensory impact, industrial implementation, and the safe design of sustained-release antimicrobial systems are also addressed, thereby providing a framework for the rational development and implementation of effective clean-label preservation strategies in meat systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.