ReviewBiology2026
Mycotoxins as an Underestimated Honeybee Stressor: Aflatoxin, Contaminated Pollen, and Colony-Level Risk.
Review in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pollinators play a critical role in agricultural productivity and the maintenance of flowering plant diversity, yet their health is increasingly threatened by multiple environmental stressors. While research has traditionally focused on pathogens, pesticides, habitat loss, and nutritional limitation, fungal secondary metabolites, mycotoxins, remain an underappreciated risk factor. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the presence, exposure pathways, and biological impacts of key mycotoxins, including aflatoxin B1, ochratoxin A, deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, and T-2 toxin, in bee-collected pollen and bee bread. We discuss how contaminated food matrices act as reservoirs of chronic exposure, linking forager activity, nurse bee physiology, brood development, and colony-level outcomes. Evidence from laboratory studies highlights sublethal effects on survival, hypopharyngeal gland development, immunity, and gut microbiota, with potential interactions with pathogens, nutritional stress, pesticides, and climate change. Furthermore, we extend these insights to wild pollinators, emphasizing differences in colony size, diet breadth, and detoxification capacity. Analytical methods for detecting mycotoxins, including HPLC, LC-MS/MS, and ELISA, are evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and relevance to field exposure. By integrating environmental concentrations with laboratory toxicity thresholds, this review identifies critical knowledge gaps and proposes a mechanistic framework linking mycotoxin exposure to colony-level risk. The findings underscore the need for targeted monitoring, improved risk assessment, and multi-stressor evaluation to safeguard both managed and wild pollinator populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.