ReviewBiology2026
Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Biofilm Pathogenesis, Immune Dysregulation, and Emerging Prosthetic Interface Strategies.
Review in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a major clinical challenge after total joint arthroplasty because of its association with prolonged antimicrobial therapy, repeated surgery, implant failure, functional disability, and substantial socioeconomic burden. Current strategies, including systemic antibiotics, debridement with implant retention, staged revision, and antibiotic-loaded cement spacers, remain indispensable but are limited by mature biofilm tolerance, protected microbial reservoirs, insufficient local drug penetration, persistent inflammation, and compromised periprosthetic bone repair. Increasing evidence indicates that PJI is not merely bacterial colonization of an implant surface, but a dynamic prosthetic interface disorder involving biofilm persistence, immune dysregulation, inflammatory osteolysis, and failed osseointegration. This review summarizes recent advances in anti-infective prosthetic interface design, emphasizing the transition from passive antibacterial coatings toward multifunctional immuno-antibacterial osseointegrative systems. The pathogenic basis of PJI is first discussed, including conditioning film formation, bacterial adhesion, biofilm maturation, protected reservoirs, immune evasion, and osteolysis. Current clinical management limitations are then evaluated, followed by emerging biomaterial strategies, including anti-adhesive and contact-killing surfaces, active antimicrobial coatings, mature biofilm disruption, biological antibiofilm therapies, smart infection-responsive delivery systems, and osteoimmunomodulatory interfaces. Particular attention is given to balancing early antibacterial activity with cytocompatibility, immune resolution, angiogenesis, mechanical durability, and long-term osseointegration. Finally, key translational barriers are highlighted, including load-bearing and tribological constraints, insufficiently standardized mature biofilm and animal models, limited clinical evidence for advanced smart materials, manufacturing reproducibility, sterilization compatibility, regulatory complexity, and application-specific clinical readiness. Future anti-PJI interfaces should evolve beyond unidirectional bacterial killing toward stage-specific systems integrating biofilm control, immune restoration, vascularized bone regeneration, and durable mechanical performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.