ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Qualitative Evaluation of the Seated Physical Activity INtervention (SPIN) Randomized Controlled Trial for Wheelchair Users with Multiple Sclerosis (MS): Formative Feedback and Future Directions.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesWheelchair users with multiple sclerosis (MS) often face barriers that restrict participation in physical activity and exercise training. This manuscript reports on participant feedback to guide evaluating and refining a novel exercise training program, Seated Physical activity INtervention (SPIN). SPIN was adapted from the Guidelines for Exercise in MS (GEMS) approach using a three-step community-engaged research framework based on meeting the needs of wheelchair users with MS.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 9 participants who completed the 16-week SPIN intervention. The key SPIN intervention components were the exercise prescription, exercise equipment, and behavioral coaching grounded in Social Cognitive Theory. Formative interview domains included overall experience, enjoyable and missing components, delivery modifications, barriers, lessons learned, and additional research topics of interest. Data were analyzed and reported using a rapid qualitative analysis approach.
resultsInterviews averaged 16 ± 10 min. Participants reported enjoying SPIN, noting program strengths as being flexible and appropriate for individuals with MS, receiving coaching calls by knowledgeable staff that offered support and accountability, and receiving exercise equipment and video demonstrations. Participants also identified strategies for enhancing the program such as including peer support, offering real-time feedback during exercise, and adding other wellness behavior topics (e.g., diet).
conclusionsThe results offer helpful ideas to consider when developing exercise training programs for wheelchair users with MS and other disabilities that may improve health and well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.