Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42450903›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026

The Many Faces of Stress: Preliminary Validation of a Remote Photoplethysmography-Based Tool for Psychophysiological Stress and Emotional Distress Monitoring.

Livio Provenzi, Valeria Calcaterra, Sarah Nazzari, Paolo Osvaldo Agnelli, Marco Xodo, Sergio De Pasquale, Gianvincenzo Zuccotti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Livio ProvenziDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7424-8744
Valeria CalcaterraPediatric and Adolescent Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2137-5974
Sarah NazzariDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7464-8024
Paolo Osvaldo AgnelliCome Stai S.p.A, 20132 Milano, Italy.
Marco XodoCome Stai S.p.A, 20132 Milano, Italy.
Sergio De PasqualeCome Stai S.p.A, 20132 Milano, Italy.
Gianvincenzo ZuccottiPediatric Department, Buzzi Children's Hospital, 20154 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2795-9874

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic stress contributes to mental and physical disorders, including burnout, anxiety, and depression. While self-report assessments remain valuable, they are inherently subjective and may be insensitive to short-term psychophysiological fluctuations. Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) enables non-contact extraction of cardiovascular signals from facial videos and has increasingly been explored for stress-related monitoring through heart rate and heart rate variability features.

objectiveThis preliminary study aimed to assess the feasibility, usability, and preliminary construct validity of a mobile rPPG-based application for psychophysiological stress monitoring in daily life by examining usability, stress index distributions, and associations with self-reported psychological distress.

methodsA total of 252 participants from the general population and university students completed standardized facial video acquisition using a smartphone-based rPPG application and self-report questionnaires. The app extracted pulse wave signals, computed cardiovascular features related to heart rate and pulse rate variability, and integrated them into three indices: Stress Level, Stress Recovery, and Stress Response. Correlation and regression analyses examined associations with psychological distress.

resultsThe three indices showed substantial inter-individual variability. Stress Level was significantly associated with anxiety (r = 0.13,

conclusionsThe present findings should therefore be interpreted as preliminary and exploratory evidence of construct validity, suggesting that the app-derived indices may capture individual differences in stress-related physiological activation in everyday contexts. Currently, the observed associations were weak, the model explained limited variance, and the results do not demonstrate clinical validity, diagnostic utility, or predictive accuracy. Looking ahead, further longitudinal studies, repeated rPPG assessments, correction-aware analyses, and validation against reference physiological measures are needed before these indices can be considered suitable for clinical or preventive use.

Indexed as

appexploratory validationmonitoringpsychophysiological stressremote photoplethysmographystress

Identifiers

PMID42450903
PMCPMC13361428

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.