ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Toxicokinetic-Informed Evidential Learning for Applicability-Domain-Aware QSAR/QSPR Prediction of Environmental Contaminant Toxicity.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative structure-activity relationship and quantitative structure-property relationship (QSAR/QSPR)-based molecular toxicity prediction provides an in silico strategy for prioritizing environmental contaminants when longer-duration bioassay data are sparse. However, many Simplified Molecular-Input Line-Entry System (SMILES)-based machine learning models treat exposure duration as an unconstrained numerical covariate and provide limited information on whether predictions are supported by the observed temporal domain. Here, we evaluated an applicability-domain-aware chemoinformatics framework that combines transformer-derived molecular representations with toxicokinetic-informed temporal encoding and evidential uncertainty estimation. The approach replaces conventional log10-transformed time encoding with a bounded first-order toxicokinetic saturation feature and combines this representation with Deep Evidential Regression to support a joint chemical-temporal view of the QSAR/QSPR applicability domain. Using experimentally derived U.S. EPA Ecotoxicology Knowledgebase (ECOTOX) fish EC50 mortality records, models were trained on 48,728 acute-duration observations and evaluated retrospectively on 2090 temporally separated longer-duration observations. The combined toxicokinetic and evidential model reduced temporal extrapolation error relative to conventional time encoding while maintaining comparable within-domain validation performance. The learned population-level timescale converged to 221 ± 3 h, consistent with accumulation timescales extending beyond standard acute fish test durations. Epistemic uncertainty was positively associated with absolute prediction error across all 10 folds, suggesting that the uncertainty estimates retained sample-level information relevant to applicability-domain-aware molecular toxicity screening. Cross-species analyses further showed that model behavior depended on training time coverage, with greater convergence when available assays covered a larger fraction of the learned timescale. These results suggest that toxicokinetic-informed temporal encoding can improve uncertainty-aware QSAR/QSPR modeling of environmental contaminant toxicity and support prioritization of compounds for further testing, while complementing rather than replacing chronic bioassays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.