SynthesisThoracic cancer2026
Molecular-Based Risk Prediction Models for Recurrence After Curative Treatment of Early-Stage Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Thoracic cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrence after curative treatment remains a major challenge in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Molecular-based prediction models may improve risk stratification and support personalized surveillance strategies. To identify and evaluate molecular-based risk prediction models for recurrence and survival following curative treatment of early-stage NSCLC. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and a published PROSPERO protocol. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 2000 and December 2023. Eligible studies reported performance metrics of molecular-based models predicting recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, or overall survival following curative treatment for NSCLC. Data extraction was performed using the CHARMS framework, risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST, and model performance metrics were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Of 2447 records identified, five studies met the inclusion criteria. All models used Cox proportional hazards regression. Molecular predictors included mRNA expression profiles (n = 3), long noncoding RNAs (n = 1), and DNA methylation biomarkers (n = 1). Internal validation studies reported AUC values ranging from 0.66 to 0.89, with a pooled AUC of 0.77 (95% CI = 0.66-0.90; I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.