Evidence mapPaperPMID 42453137Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026

Bioinks in systems biology: integrating biomaterial design with cellular network modelling for predictive biofabrication.

Inamul Hasan Madar, Jayant Pawar, Punitha Muruganantham, Syed Suhaib Ahmed, Vansh Vohra, Janakiraman Velayudam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Inamul Hasan Madar *Center for Integrative Omics Data Science (CIODS), Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Jayant Pawar *Krishna Institute of Science and Technology, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Taluka-Karad, Maharashtra, India.
Punitha MurugananthamCenter for Integrative Omics Data Science (CIODS), Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Syed Suhaib AhmedDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Yenepoya Pharmacy College and Research Centre, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Vansh VohraM.M College of Pharmacy, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Haryana, India.
Janakiraman VelayudamCenter for Integrative Omics Data Science (CIODS), Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioinks facilitate patient-relevant tissue models by merging living cells with a programmable matrix whose composition, mechanics, and transport properties can be altered in three dimensions and tracked over time. Modern bioink formulations use nano and micro technologies that function as real-time biosensors of the cellular microenvironment. This narrative review offers systems biology and artificial intelligence perspectives crucial for bioink design due to its established biomaterial role, which acts as both a passive structural support and an active regulator in complex biological networks. Additionally, we briefly discuss current challenges and future perspectives on using bioinks as behaviour in various aspects that offers real time monitoring, and linking material composition to biological performance outcomes.

Indexed as

biofabricationbioinkmechanistic modelingmulti-omicssystems biology

Identifiers

PMID42453137
PMCPMC13364850

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.