ReviewAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2026
Use of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound in the Periorbital Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review.
Review in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Periorbital aging represents one of the earliest manifestations of facial aging, resulting from structural changes across cutaneous, adipose, and muscular layers of the periocular region. Although high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is increasingly used for noninvasive rejuvenation, evidence on periorbital outcomes remains scarce. Objectives: To synthesize the effectiveness and safety of HIFU technologies for periorbital rejuvenation in adults. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar were searched for studies published between January 2015 and November 2025. Randomized trials and prospective or retrospective cohort studies evaluating HIFU applied to the periorbital region were included. Outcomes included wrinkle severity, skin elasticity, texture, lifting effects, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed. Results: Ten studies involving 10 to 191 participants were included. Across included studies, HIFU demonstrated significant improvements in periorbital wrinkle severity, biomechanical skin elasticity (Cutometer R2, R5, and R7), surface topography (PRIMOS Ra and Rz), and eyebrow or eyelid contour. Greater improvement was observed with multiple treatment sessions. Adverse events were generally mild and transient, including erythema, edema, and pain; rare complications (<1%) occurred without permanent sequelae. Conclusions: High-intensity focused ultrasound appears to be a safe and effective noninvasive option for periorbital rejuvenation. However, the certainty of evidence is very low due to nonrandomized designs and heterogeneity, highlighting the need for well-designed randomized controlled trials with standardized protocols. Level of Evidence 3 Therapeutic:
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.