ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2026
Long TB: Framing post-acute sequelae of tuberculosis as a distinct clinical entity.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) has historically been declared cured at the point of microbiological clearance. Yet emerging evidence from systematic reviews and cohort studies demonstrates that between 30% and 80% of pulmonary TB survivors experience persistent symptoms, organ damage or functional impairment after treatment completion; a burden that existing outcome metrics fail to capture. We propose the term Long TB, with the formal designation Post-Acute Sequelae of Tuberculosis (PAST-TB), as a conceptual and clinical framework to define, study and address this under-recognised morbidity. Drawing explicit parallels with Long COVID (post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 or PASC), we argue that the Long TB framing is not merely rhetorical but scientifically grounded, strategically powerful and urgently needed. With approximately 155 million TB survivors alive globally and modelling studies attributing up to 47% of TB-related disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) to the post-treatment period, the case for a systematic post-TB care agenda, anchored by this new terminology is compelling. We attempt to outline the multi-system domains of Long TB, its shared pathological drivers with PASC and the programmatic and research reforms required to move from bacteriological to biological cure as the standard of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.