Evidence mapPaperPMID 42453269Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2026

AI-powered tools in family medicine: Bridging technology and practice.

Sultan Alnashmi Alqasim, Fahad M Bindakhil, Mommed M Alzahrani, Samar Fahad A Alhajri, Ghaida M Alzaidi, Sara Fahad A Alhajri, Noha Tashkandi, Assad M Arafah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sultan Alnashmi AlqasimDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad M BindakhilDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mommed M AlzahraniFamily Medicine Department, College of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Samar Fahad A AlhajriDepartment of Medicine, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ghaida M AlzaidiMedical Laboratory Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Sara Fahad A AlhajriDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Noha TashkandiMedical Research Department, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Assad M ArafahFamily Medicine Department, College of Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the perceptions, attitudes, and readiness of family physicians in Saudi Arabia toward the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical practice and to identify factors influencing its use. Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted between April and July 2025 among family medicine physicians across Saudi Arabia. A validated questionnaire captured demographic and professional characteristics, current and past AI use, perceived benefits and risks, factors influencing adoption, and preferred physician-AI collaboration models. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, bivariate tests, and multivariable logistic regression to identify independent predictors of AI use. Results: Of 400 invited physicians, 345 responded (response rate 86.3%). Overall, 45.8% reported using AI tools in the past year, most commonly ChatGPT (65.2%). AI use was more prevalent among physicians aged 25-34 years, those with ≤5 years of experience, Saudi nationals, residents, and those in tertiary hospitals. High awareness (70.2%) and willingness to learn (81.0%) were reported, with 81.6% supporting AI-related training. Key adoption drivers were reliability (80.4%), efficiency (70.3%), and ease of use (69.7%), while major barriers included lack of high-quality data (69.7%), inadequate algorithms (57.6%), and integration challenges (47.0%). Most respondents (76.5%) preferred a physician-led, AI-assisted model. Conclusion: Family physicians in Saudi Arabia show good engagement with AI and strong interest in training, alongside concerns over reliability, data quality, and workflow integration. Adoption is shaped by age, experience, and workplace setting. Addressing these barriers through targeted education, robust governance, and codesigned integration strategies could enhance AI uptake in family medicine.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligencefamily medicinephysician attitudesphysician readinessSaudi Arabiatechnology acceptance

Identifiers

PMID42453269
PMCPMC13367586

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.