ArticleFrontiers in toxicology2026
Modular
Article in Frontiers in toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In this study, we developed a modular in vitro platform that integrates advanced polymer-drug conjugation chemistry with stepwise cytotoxicity screening in both 2D (monolayer) and 3D (spheroids) glioblastoma (GBM) models. Buparlisib was selected as the model therapeutic agent due to its well-characterised mechanism of action, high blood-brain barrier permeability, and relevance to PI3K-targeted therapy. Methods: Two mechanistically distinct conjugation strategies were explored using N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide-based copolymers (pHPMA). The first strategy was based on a redox-sensitive disulphide linkage designed for intracellular glutathione-triggered release, whereas the second used an azide-bearing derivative compatible with strain-promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition. Drug release was assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Biological activity was systematically evaluated in U87MG, U118MG, and T98G cells under 2D conditions using a resazurin-based metabolic activity assay. Subsequently, the more promising disulphide-based formulations were assessed in 3D spheroids by metabolic activity measurements and live-cell monitoring of spheroid growth dynamics. Results: Free buparlisib showed the strongest inhibitory effect, while its modification and polymer conjugation reduced the apparent activity. Nevertheless, the disulphide-based derivative and polymer conjugate retained concentration-dependent activity, whereas the azide-based polymer conjugate showed minimal effects. Moreover, treatment responses differed between cell lines and between 2D and 3D models. Discussion: Overall, linker chemistry, cell-line-specific behaviour, and model dimensionality strongly influenced the biological performance of the polymeric buparlisib formulations. The redox-sensitive polymer conjugate therefore represents the more promising strategy for further development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.