ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
Integrating physical fitness and psychology: an in-depth discussion of exercise interventions for weight reduction among university students.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This in-depth study challenges a prevailing assumption in the field of university student weight management that the principal lever is the prescription of ever-more-efficient exercise modalities and argues instead that the more decisive determinant is whether existing modalities are delivered in ways that satisfy students' basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, as articulated by Self-Determination Theory (SDT). We adopt SDT as the unifying theoretical lens through which we re-interpret the recurring barriers documented in the post-pandemic, smartphone-saturated university literature: weight-related self-stigma (a threat to competence and relatedness), low exercise self-efficacy (a threat to competence), academic time pressure and digital over-load (threats to autonomy), and the bidirectional load of stress, anxiety, and impaired sleep. Within this framework, structured aerobic training, high-intensity interval and sprint training (HIIT/SIT), and muscle-strengthening exercise (MSE) are re-evaluated not as competing physiological prescriptions but as need-supportive options whose suitability depends on the student's dominant psychological barrier and profile, with explicit psychological indications offered for each. We elevate Physical Literacy (PL) the integrated motivation, confidence, competence, knowledge, and understanding required to sustain physical activity across life to a core, life-course-oriented outcome of intervention rather than a peripheral construct. The review then connects these individual-level mechanisms to multi-level institutional levers (technology-mediated coaching, environmental redesign, and policy) that are uniquely available to universities. Limitations of the underlying evidence including the predominance of cross-sectional designs, single-study findings, measurement heterogeneity, and geographic skew toward Chinese and Gulf samples are explicitly bounded. We propose a coherent, theoretically grounded, and operationally actionable framework for transforming the university stage from a high-risk window for weight gain into a launchpad for life-long Physical Literacy and wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.