Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42453497›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026

Sex differences in resting state EEG spectral power are more prominent than menstrual cycle effects in healthy young adults.

Angelika K Sawicka, Aleksandra M Zieminska, Natalia Zalewska, Adrianna Czerwińska, Katarzyna M Michalak, Barbara Naparło, Nastaran Hamedi, Jesús S García-Salinas, Anna B Marcinkowska, Michal T Kucewicz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Angelika K SawickaApplied Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Department of Neurophysiology, Neuropsychology and Neuroinformatics, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Aleksandra M ZieminskaBrain & Mind Electrophysiology Laboratory, BioTechMed Center, Multimedia Systems Department, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland.
Natalia ZalewskaBrain & Mind Electrophysiology Laboratory, BioTechMed Center, Multimedia Systems Department, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland.
Adrianna CzerwińskaBrain & Mind Electrophysiology Laboratory, BioTechMed Center, Multimedia Systems Department, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland.
Katarzyna M MichalakApplied Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Department of Neurophysiology, Neuropsychology and Neuroinformatics, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Barbara NaparłoApplied Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Department of Neurophysiology, Neuropsychology and Neuroinformatics, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Nastaran HamediBrain & Mind Electrophysiology Laboratory, BioTechMed Center, Multimedia Systems Department, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland.
Jesús S García-SalinasBrain & Mind Electrophysiology Laboratory, BioTechMed Center, Multimedia Systems Department, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland.
Anna B MarcinkowskaApplied Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Department of Neurophysiology, Neuropsychology and Neuroinformatics, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Michal T KucewiczBrain & Mind Electrophysiology Laboratory, BioTechMed Center, Multimedia Systems Department, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland.
Paweł J WinklewskiDepartment of Neurophysiology, Neuropsychology and Neuroinformatics, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sex hormones modulate brain function, but their specific effects on neural oscillations remain incompletely understood. This study examined associations between sex hormone concentrations and resting-state EEG spectral power in healthy young adults, comparing women with high versus low estradiol levels assessed during pre-ovulatory and menstrual cycle phases respectively, alongside sex differences between women and men. Methods: We examined resting-state EEG spectral power in 57 healthy adults (26 men, 31 women) using verified hormone measurements. Women were assessed twice across menstrual cycle phases (menstrual and pre-ovulatory), while men were assessed once. Spectral power analysis was performed across seven EEG frequency bands. Statistical comparisons of EEG group differences employed a non-parametric cluster-based permutation framework, using paired and independent-samples Wilcoxon statistics depending on the nature of the comparison. Hormone-EEG associations were assessed separately within each sex: Spearman rank correlations for males and linear mixed-effects models for females, with FDR correction. Results: Sex differences in spectral power were more prominent than differences between the investigated cycle phases, with no significant differences observed between the two female groups. Group-level comparisons revealed widespread sex differences in high-frequency bands predominantly in frontal and central-left regions. Within the male group, no hormone-EEG associations survived FDR correction. Within-female analyses revealed focal associations of estradiol with posterior high gamma power, and of progesterone with theta and high beta power at temporo-frontal and parietal sites. Conclusions: Sex hormones relate to resting-state EEG oscillations through two distinct levels of influence: long-term organizational shaping of cortical architecture, reflected in widespread between-sex differences, and acute receptor-mediated modulation, reflected in focal within-female associations. These findings underscore the importance of considering both sex and hormonal status as fundamental biological variables in electrophysiological research.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyMenstrual CycleRestSex CharacteristicsAdultEstradiolFemaleHumansMaleProgesteroneYoung AdultEstradiolProgesteronedefault mode networkestradiolmenstrual cyclenetwork oscillationsprogesteronesex differencesspectral powertestosterone

Identifiers

PMID42453497
PMCPMC13364567

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.