Evidence mapPaperPMID 42453529Full record

ArticleTzu chi medical journal

Shedding light on gestational loss: The role of Vitamin D 25(OH)D deficiency in miscarriage - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cut Adeya Adella, Felix Khosasi, Elbert Elbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tzu chi medical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cut Adeya AdellaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.
Felix KhosasiFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.
Elbert ElbertFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Miscarriage is a common pregnancy complication with various contributing factors. Recent studies suggest that maternal Vitamin D deficiency may increase the risk of early pregnancy loss. Vitamin D is essential for immune regulation, placental development, and fetal growth. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between maternal Vitamin D status and miscarriage. Materials and Methods: This meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines, including observational studies from PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane (2018-2025). Eligible studies reported serum 25(OH)D levels and miscarriage outcomes. Data on serum Vitamin D, miscarriage incidence, and odds ratios (ORs) were extracted. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4 and R, with evaluation of heterogeneity and publication bias. Results: Women who experienced miscarriage had significantly lower Vitamin D levels than those with ongoing pregnancies (mean difference: -5.48 ng/mL; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -9.77 to -1.19; Conclusion: Maternal Vitamin D deficiency is significantly associated with an increased risk of miscarriage. These findings support the potential benefit of assessing and optimizing Vitamin D status in preconception and antenatal care to improve the pregnancy outcomes.

Indexed as

25(OH)D levelsMaternal healthMiscarriagePregnancy lossVitamin D deficiency

Identifiers

PMID42453529
PMCPMC13367647

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.