Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42453530›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2026

The cellular basis of locomotor evolution: insights from larval insects.

Annika Sharma, Samantha Swank, Elizabeth S Heckscher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Annika SharmaCommittee on Neurobiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Samantha SwankCommittee on Development, Regeneration, and Stem Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Elizabeth S HeckscherDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

Funding

Genetic Mechanisms and Evolution-RenewalT32GM139782 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Francesca Luca, John Novembre · 2021 to 2026
$5.1M
Development of neuronal circuits for innate behaviorR01NS105748 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI HECKSCHER, ELIZABETH (ELLIE) S · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Afferent proprioceptive signaling in Drosophila larvaeR56NS134862 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GERSHOW, MARC HERMAN, HECKSCHER, ELIZABETH (ELLIE) S · 2025 to 2025
$459k
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM139782NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105748NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS134862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals move through their environments using remarkably diverse locomotor behaviors, which are critical for their survival and success. All movement, including locomotion, requires the coordinated function of three components: the central nervous system (CNS), the peripheral nervous system (PNS), and the musculature. Although evolutionary change in any one of these components can alter locomotion, how these changes arise and combine to generate behavioral diversity remains poorly understood. Larval insects are an exceptional system for addressing this question: they combine extensive behavioral and morphological diversity with relatively simple, stereotyped anatomy, enabling cell-level homology inferences and quantitative cross-tissue comparisons. We first review anatomical evidence for the long-standing peripheral change hypothesis, which posits that locomotor diversity is primarily driven by modifications to peripheral structures, such as muscles, while central circuits remain conserved. We then propose an alternative hypothesis, the motor neuron bottleneck hypothesis, which draws on comparative neurodevelopmental data to suggest that motor neurons are disproportionately conserved relative to both upstream sensory neurons and interneurons and downstream muscles. Finally, we consider how connections are maintained between the CNS, PNS, and musculature when these components change in number. Throughout, we assess relative rates of evolutionary change in cell number across nested phylogenetic scales, from the

Identifiers

PMID42453530
PMCPMC13367504

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.