ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2026
The cellular basis of locomotor evolution: insights from larval insects.
Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animals move through their environments using remarkably diverse locomotor behaviors, which are critical for their survival and success. All movement, including locomotion, requires the coordinated function of three components: the central nervous system (CNS), the peripheral nervous system (PNS), and the musculature. Although evolutionary change in any one of these components can alter locomotion, how these changes arise and combine to generate behavioral diversity remains poorly understood. Larval insects are an exceptional system for addressing this question: they combine extensive behavioral and morphological diversity with relatively simple, stereotyped anatomy, enabling cell-level homology inferences and quantitative cross-tissue comparisons. We first review anatomical evidence for the long-standing peripheral change hypothesis, which posits that locomotor diversity is primarily driven by modifications to peripheral structures, such as muscles, while central circuits remain conserved. We then propose an alternative hypothesis, the motor neuron bottleneck hypothesis, which draws on comparative neurodevelopmental data to suggest that motor neurons are disproportionately conserved relative to both upstream sensory neurons and interneurons and downstream muscles. Finally, we consider how connections are maintained between the CNS, PNS, and musculature when these components change in number. Throughout, we assess relative rates of evolutionary change in cell number across nested phylogenetic scales, from the
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.