ArticleHemaSphere2026
Switching between complement inhibitors in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: Analysis of strategy, efficacy, and safety.
Article in HemaSphere, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is an ultra-orphan disease. In 2026, approved complement inhibitors (CIs) for PNH include three C5 inhibitors (C5i) and three proximal inhibitors (PIs). Clinical trials for the approved PI pegcetacoplan, iptacopan, and C5i + danicopan had clear protocols for changing from terminal to PI, extrapolated into real-world practice. There is no guidance for patients changing from a PI to a different CI. We present the largest international cohort to date. The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients established on a PI, who have changed treatment to a different CI. Sixty-five patients with a median age at PNH diagnosis of 40 years were included. Indications for CI switch were as follows: hemolysis (extravascular/recurrent breakthrough/not specified), side effects, trial termination, patient choice, and other. CI changes (149) were classified as (1) terminal-to-proximal (75/149), 6 hemolytic events reported within 14 days of CI change; (2) proximal-to-proximal (45/149), 2 hemolytic events reported within 14 days of CI change; and (3) proximal-to-terminal (29/149), 13 hemolytic events within 14 days of CI change. This is the largest cohort of PNH patients facing multiple CI changes. With the increasing availability of different CI classes, patients may experience several treatment changes over their disease course. CI should not be interrupted. The cohort would suggest that overlapping treatment for patients changing from PI to another CI is not required. Tapering of treatment does not seem to be effective at preventing hemolysis complications. Patients should be monitored closely for hemolysis, especially when changing from proximal-to-terminal inhibition. Prospective clinical/laboratory analysis is recommended for further clarification management for this patient group.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.