ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026
Patient Preferences for Direct versus Indirect Dental Veneers: Associations with Durability, Socioeconomic Status, and Satisfaction.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Expatriates represent a growing patient group seeking aesthetic dental treatments in cosmopolitan settings, yet limited evidence is available regarding factors associated with their choice between direct and indirect veneers. This study aimed to examine factors associated with veneer preference, assess the association of educational level and economic status with treatment interest, and evaluate the relationship between satisfaction and recommendation intent among expatriates in Erbil. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from January to June 2023 among 439 expatriates recruited from private dental clinics and cosmetic centres in Erbil using stratified convenience sampling. A validated 48-item questionnaire assessed demographics, prior dental experience, decision-making factors using 5-point Likert scales, veneer preference, satisfaction, and recommendation intent. Data were analysed using χ Results: Durability showed the strongest independent association with preference for indirect veneers compared with direct veneers (adjusted OR 2.65 per 1-point increase, 95% CI 1.78-3.95, p<0.001). Aesthetic outcome was ranked as the most important consideration overall by 44.4% of participants, but it was no longer statistically significant after adjustment. A significant education × economic status interaction was observed (p=0.03), indicating that the association between higher education and interest in veneers was more evident among participants with good or very good economic status. Among veneer recipients (n=68), 76.5% were very or somewhat satisfied; higher satisfaction was strongly associated with recommendation intent (adjusted OR 4.21 per 1-point increase, 95% CI 2.84-6.24, p<0.001). Overall, 40.3% of participants remained undecided about veneer type. Conclusion: In this cross-sectional study of expatriates in Erbil, durability was associated with preference for indirect veneers, while socioeconomic status appeared to shape treatment interest. Higher satisfaction was also associated with greater willingness to recommend veneer treatment. These findings support the use of targeted patient education, transparent discussions of expected longevity, and flexible financing strategies to facilitate informed decision-making in mobile expatriate populations. Because of the cross-sectional design, these findings should be interpreted as associations rather than causal effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.