ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026
Factors Influencing Healthcare-Seeking Preferences Among Patients in County Medical Consortium in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Under China's county medical consortium system, this study explores how level of care integration and other key attributes of medical institutions influence patients' healthcare choices and examines differences in preferences among population subgroups. Patients and Methods: This study constructed a virtual medical institution choice set using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with eight institutional attributes. A total of 676 respondents were recruited via an online convenience sample on the Credamo platform using a self-developed questionnaire. The conditional logit model and fixed effects model were adopted to analyze 10,816 valid observations. Results: Medical quality emerges as the primary factor influencing patients' healthcare choices, followed by the level of care integration. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that rural residents and individuals with lower educational attainment prioritize practical factors such as convenience and medical costs. Individuals with higher education levels and female patients demonstrate greater concern for medical care quality. Conclusion: All findings reflect stated preferences in hypothetical scenarios rather than observed healthcare-seeking behavior. Within this stated-preference framework, higher levels of integrated care, streamlined referral procedures and higher levels of information sharing were consistently associated with stronger patient choice. Importantly, we make no causal claim that these preferences directly predict real-world care-seeking or system-level outcomes. To move from stated preference to observed behavior, future research combining offline representative sampling with real utilization data is needed to validate and extend these patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.