ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
A cluster analysis of 466 patients demonstrates that glutathione supplementation could preferentially benefit advanced unstable cirrhosis phenotype rather than stable cirrhosis.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic liver disease is characterized by progressive hepatic glutathione depletion and oxidative stress, yet antioxidant therapies have historically shown disappointing clinical efficacy in unselected populations. This therapeutic paradox may reflect inadequate patient stratification and failure to distinguish between acute reversible oxidative injury and chronic persistent inflammation. We hypothesized that glutathione supplementation may preferentially benefit distinct cirrhosis phenotypes with active systemic inflammation. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 466 patients with chronic liver disease who received oral glutathione supplementation (500 mg daily, median 30 days) at a tertiary care center. Primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and change in Model for End-Stage Liver Disease 3.0 (MELD-3) score. We employed conventional statistical methods, survival analysis, multivariable regression, machine learning feature importance, and unsupervised K-means clustering to identify distinct patient phenotypes. Results: Overall mortality was 10.9% over median 417-day follow-up. At the population level, MELD-3 worsened significantly (mean ΔMELD-3 +2.69, p < 0.001), though 33.5% of patients achieved MELD-3 improvement with low mortality (1.9%). Treatment duration showed no dose-response relationship. Counter-intuitively, patients with higher baseline MELD, bilirubin, INR, and C-reactive protein demonstrated better treatment response. K-means clustering identified four phenotypes, with the "Potential High-Risk Responder" cluster (10.9% of cohort, median MELD-3 27.9) showing highest improvement rate (52.9%) and the only mean MELD-3 improvement (ΔMELD-3-0.85), despite highest mortality (23.5%). An "ideal responder profile" comprising younger patients with alcohol-associated liver disease, elevated baseline MELD, preserved albumin, and elevated inflammatory markers achieved 70.5% improvement rates. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that glutathione supplementation may preferentially benefits patients with advanced, acutely unstable cirrhosis characterized by active systemic inflammation rather than stable compensated disease, challenging indiscriminate antioxidant use and supporting a precision-medicine approach targeting inflammation-rich, treatment-responsive phenotypes in chronic liver disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.