ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Fruit and vegetable consumption and metabolic syndrome in Chinese adults: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evidence suggests inverse associations between fruit and vegetable intakes and metabolic syndrome (MetS), but data from Chinese populations remain limited, particularly regarding component-specific associations and whether associations vary according to concurrent intake of other major food groups. Objective: To examine associations of fruit and vegetable intakes with MetS and its individual components, and to explore whether these associations vary across co-consumption patterns of other major food groups. Materials and methods: This community-based cross-sectional study included 5,107 adults from Suzhou, China. Dietary intake was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Joint analyses evaluated combinations of fruit or vegetable intake with other major food groups. Results: Higher fruit and vegetable intakes were associated with lower odds of MetS. Comparing the highest with the lowest quartile, adjusted ORs were 0.82 (95% CI 0.69-0.97; Conclusion: In this community-based sample of Chinese adults, higher fruit and vegetable intakes were associated with lower odds of MetS, with fruit showing broader inverse associations across individual components than vegetables. Exploratory joint analyses suggested that these associations varied according to co-consumption patterns of other major food groups, particularly red meat intake. Prospective studies are needed to clarify temporality and causality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.