ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
MobileNet-WDD: a lightweight deep learning image classification method for identifying defects in wheat grains.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the challenge of simultaneously optimizing model accuracy and computational efficiency in the automated inspection of wheat grain appearance quality, this study proposes a lightweight deep learning model called MobileNet-WDD. Based on the MobileNetV4-small architecture, this model incorporates the SimAM attention mechanism to enhance feature discrimination capabilities and employs Ghost convolutions and the Mish activation function to optimize the network structure, thereby significantly reducing model complexity while maintaining high recognition accuracy. Using six typical categories of wheat grains-diseased spots, insect damage, mold, sprouting, damage, and intact grains-as the research subjects, experimental results show that compared to the baseline model, MobileNet-WDD achieves a 6.1% increase in accuracy, reaching 94.2%; a 30.3% reduction in the number of parameters; computational cost by 27.6%; and inference speed from 155 FPS to 183 FPS, representing a 1.18-fold acceleration. Quantitative analysis confirms that this model achieves high-precision recognition while offering significant advantages in terms of lightweight design and efficient computational performance, providing an efficient and feasible technical solution for real-time non-destructive inspection of wheat grains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.