Evidence mapPaperPMID 42454094Full record

ArticleNature health2026

A framework for longitudinal health AI agents.

Georgianna Lin, Rencong Jiang, Noémie Elhadad, Xuhai 'Orson' Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Georgianna LinColumbia University, Biomedical Informatics, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9993-2718
Rencong JiangColumbia University, Computer Science, New York, NY, USA.
Noémie ElhadadColumbia University, Biomedical Informatics, New York, NY, USA.
Xuhai 'Orson' XuColumbia University, Biomedical Informatics, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5930-3899

Funding

Training in Biomedical Informatics at Columbia UniversityT15LM007079 · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · 1992 to 2025
$8.3M
NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although artificial intelligence (AI) agents are increasingly proposed to support potentially longitudinal health tasks, such as symptom management, behaviour change and patient support, most current implementations fall short of facilitating user intent and fostering accountability. This contrasts with prior work on supporting longitudinal needs, both within and beyond clinical settings, where follow-up, coherent reasoning and sustained alignment with individuals' goals are critical for both effectiveness and safety. In this Perspective, we draw on established clinical and personal health informatics frameworks to define what it would mean to orchestrate longitudinal health interactions with AI agents. We propose a multilayer framework and corresponding agent architecture that operationalizes Coherence, Continuity, Adaptation and Agency across repeated interactions. Through representative use cases, we demonstrate how longitudinal agents can maintain meaningful engagement, adapt to evolving goals and support safe, personalized decision-making over time. Our findings underscore both the promise and the complexity of designing systems capable of supporting health trajectories beyond isolated interactions, and we offer guidance for future research and development in multisession, user-centred health AI.

Identifiers

PMID42454094
PMCPMC13367785

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.