SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
AI in pharmacy education: a comparative visualization analysis of global and Chinese research trends.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into healthcare necessitates a paradigm shift in pharmacy education to prepare future-ready professionals. However, the global trajectory of this educational evolution and the distinct strategic approaches between different regions remain under-explored. This study aims to systematically map the global and Chinese research landscapes, identifying evolutionary trends, pedagogical shifts, and core competency requirements in the intelligence era. Methods: A comparative visualization analysis was conducted using CiteSpace (6.4.R1) on literature retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) covering publications up to December 31, 2025 (data retrieval was conducted in early 2026). We employed co-occurrence clustering and burst detection to analyze publication trends, institutional collaborations, and keyword evolution. The study specifically examined the divergence and convergence of educational strategies between global and Chinese contexts. Results: A total of 240 English and 118 Chinese high-relevance articles were analyzed, revealing a rapid growth trajectory characterized by a logarithmic pattern, with universities as primary research hubs. The analysis identified three critical pedagogical transitions: Assessment Transformation: A shift from rote memorization to complex clinical reasoning, driven by Gen AI tools; Pedagogical Innovation: The integration of "Virtual Reality" and "Immersive Teaching," signaling a move toward technology-enhanced experiential learning; and Competency Redefinition: A pivot from traditional pharmacology knowledge to "Digital Literacy" and "Interdisciplinary Abilities." Notably, comparative analysis revealed that while global research focuses heavily on the technical integration of AI in clinical practice, Chinese literature demonstrates a stronger orientation toward policy-driven curriculum reform and top-level design. Conclusion: AI is increasingly recognized as a key catalyst associated with pedagogical evolution rather than merely a technological adjunct. Notably, while global efforts prioritize the technical integration of AI into clinical tools, Chinese initiatives emphasize top-level policy-driven curriculum reform. To bridge the gap between education and practice, institutions must transition from tool-based instruction to a deep integration of AI ethics, data logic, and clinical decision-making. This study provides an evidence-based roadmap for educators to align curricula with the accelerating digital transformation of the pharmacy profession.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.